Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

View Article

Search Articles


Ole Ned Barnett, the Editorial-Writing-Chief down at the News and Observer, is a fine fellow though like many Editorial-Chiefs he’s a bone deep liberal who frets over the vices of sexism and the virtues of gay rights and seldom finds an encouraging word to say about Republicans.

Which is fine. The N&O’s spending its own money so it can editorialize however it wants. But an op-ed – right next to Ned’s column on sexism the other day – by UNC Professor Neel Ahuja raises a different question.

Professor Ahuja’s an animal rights expert who’s also an English professor who teaches a class on the Literature of 9/11 – and he landed in a mess because a student wrote his course favors terrorists.

To quash that broadside all Professor Ahuja had to do was answer one question: Whether he was teaching his students what the terrorists did on 9/11 was right or wrong?

But instead he waltzed all around the question. He editorialized about applying ‘Holocaust, postcolonial and trauma theories to 9/11’ and about asking whether ‘God’s light guides us or blinds us?’ He denounced the student for a cynical attack on learning and denounced censoring books critical of U.S. ‘overseas military interventions.’ And, of course, he rolled out a harried professor’s tried and true shibboleth: He accused Art Pope and the John Pope Center for running smear campaigns against UNC.

But all that explaining still left an awkward problem: Because, unlike the N&O, Professor Ahuja’s not spending his own or another private citizen’s money – he’s spending taxpayers’ money.

There’s no doubt teaching how different folks – including terrorists – see the same things differently is a fine part of education. And that’s not a problem. But it’s hard to justify spending taxpayers’ money to pay for a course that doesn’t, at the end of the day, conclude the terrorists were dead wrong on 9/11.

And that’s the question Professor Ahuja needs to stop waltzing around. He needs to give a straight answer. And if his answer is, Well, it’s all relative – who was right and who was wrong depends on whose eyes you look at it through – then the Trustees are going to get asked a tough question too: You gave him money to teach what?


Actions: E-mail | Permalink | RSS comment feed |

Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :   Terms Of Use   :   Privacy Statement