A Conflict for Elaine Marshall?

Is there an inherent conflict in Secretary of State Elaine Marshall regulating lobbyists while running ads about “taking on” lobbyists?
 
And is it proper for Marshall to ask lobbyists she regulates to contribute to her campaign?
 
I’ve talked to several lobbyists who are outraged by what they see as a conflict, but are afraid to speak out.
 
Last week, the Marshall campaign sent out – in its daily news summary – a press release announcing that Marshall “has officially launched an investigation of whether Larry Jones, president of the High Rock Lake Association, lobbied illegally for Alcoa in the General Assembly….”
 
Just before the Senate primary, news broke that Marshall’s office had fined former lobbyist Don Beason $110,000 for alleged lobbying-law violations.
 
One person emailed me:
 
“The SoS has an investigative group (including a former SBI investigator), and the rules and paperwork associated with lobbying have become so confusing that everyone’s afraid that a technical paperwork violation will put them on the front page of the N&O as a common criminal.”
 
Two lobbyists told me Marshall asked them to contribute to her campaign. Another said he supports Cal Cunningham, but is afraid to give him money.
 
Cunningham hasn’t made an issue of this. But the Republicans will. Tom Fetzer and Richard Burr will use it to paint Democrats as the party of corruption, scandal and prison stripes.
 
This is the second time Marshall has been able to run for a Senate seat without giving up her day job. That’s convenient for her.
 
This time, if she wins the primary, she should consider stepping aside temporarily. That would eliminate the possibility that she’ll cross a legal or ethical line. Plus, she won’t be subject to charges that she’s campaigning on state time.
Avatar photo

Gary Pearce

Categories

Archives

Recent Posts

A Conflict for Elaine Marshall?

Is there an inherent conflict in Secretary of State Elaine Marshall regulating lobbyists while running ads about “taking on” lobbyists?
 
And is it proper for Marshall to ask lobbyists she regulates to contribute to her campaign?
 
I’ve talked to several lobbyists who are outraged by what they see as a conflict, but are afraid to speak out.
 
Last week, the Marshall campaign sent out – in its daily news summary – a press release announcing that Marshall “has officially launched an investigation of whether Larry Jones, president of the High Rock Lake Association, lobbied illegally for Alcoa in the General Assembly….”
 
Just before the Senate primary, news broke that Marshall’s office had fined former lobbyist Don Beason $110,000 for alleged lobbying-law violations.
 
One person emailed me:
 
“The SoS has an investigative group (including a former SBI investigator), and the rules and paperwork associated with lobbying have become so confusing that everyone’s afraid that a technical paperwork violation will put them on the front page of the N&O as a common criminal.”
 
Two lobbyists told me Marshall asked them to contribute to her campaign. Another said he supports Cal Cunningham, but is afraid to give him money.
 
Cunningham hasn’t made an issue of this. But the Republicans will. Tom Fetzer and Richard Burr will use it to paint Democrats as the party of corruption, scandal and prison stripes.
 
This is the second time Marshall has been able to run for a Senate seat without giving up her day job. That’s convenient for her.
 
This time, if she wins the primary, she should consider stepping aside temporarily. That would eliminate the possibility that she’ll cross a legal or ethical line. Plus, she won’t be subject to charges that she’s campaigning on state time.
Avatar photo

Gary Pearce

Categories

Archives