Archives
Blog Articles
02
Senator Richard Burr’s ad shows he knows he could be vulnerable. Voters don’t know him or what he’s done.
 
Which supports Elaine Marshall’s case for getting the $10 million she needs from the DSCC to be competitive.
 
Senate Democrats are playing defense most everywhere this year. It would be nice to make one raid in Republican territory. Make them spend time and money here instead of against a Democratic incumbent.
 
Public Policy Polling has repeatedly noted Burr’s weakness.
 
RealClearPolitics says Burr is in “the danger zone.”
 
Marshall has a good campaign team, and she can draw a sharp contrast with Burr. She can attack him on voting for the bailout, which will temper Republicans’ enthusiasm for him and hurt him with independents.  She can attack him as a 16-year Washington politician.
 
Plus, she has an advantage: She’s a woman.
 
PPP’s analysis shows that Democratic voters aren’t energized. Money – and a visit by President Obama – could change that.
 
Which would help not only Marshall, but also Democratic congressional incumbents. And Democratic chances in the legislative races. And redistricting in 2011. And Obama’s chances here in 2012.
 
The votes are there for Marshall. The question is whether she’ll have the money to get them.
 

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (2) RSS comment feed |
01
A reader called today with an interesting thought spurred by Richard Burr’s ad.
 
She took issue with his suggestion that all jobs come from the private sector. She pointed out that government contracts with Blackwater, Halliburton, KBR and a raft of defense contractors sure created a bunch of jobs.
 
She has a point. When private companies aren’t hiring, a government job – or a job created by a government contract – can pay the rent.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (4) RSS comment feed |
01
Remember the furor last year when Governor Perdue announced that dozens of long-term, convicted criminals might get out of prison early because of an issue over “good time”?
 
Remember how everybody said what a disaster this would be for her?
 
Remember how critics said she overreacted by threatening to stand in the jailhouse door to prevent their release?
 
Then, last week, did you notice when the state Supreme Court ruled that she was, in fact, right? That the inmates wouldn’t be getting out early?
 
Somehow that didn’t get quite the same attention.
 
The Governor and her people should enjoy some told-you-so’s here.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |
31
My friend Damon Circosta, executive director on the N.C. Center for Voter Education, gets an A for effort but an F for persuasiveness.
 
Circosta, according to Under the Dome, says the flap over Governor Perdue’s campaign not reporting some flights is an argument for “voter-owned” (publicly financed) campaigns. http://projects.newsobserver.com/dome#ixzz0yBS20BU0 
 
The logic goes over my head.
 
Why is a candidate taking public funds any less likely to commit a reporting error than a candidate taking individual and PAC contributions?
 
I hope Damon will enlighten me.
 
As I’ve blogged before, I understand that public-financing supporters are well-intentioned – and right to be concerned about corruption in today’s system. But if President Obama had used public financing, he couldn’t have competed in North Carolina.
 
There is a case to be made for public financing. I just down see how this is it.
 
 
 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (2) RSS comment feed |
31
I’m amused by people who argue that the “mosque” shouldn’t be built near Ground Zero because a poll showed a majority of Americans oppose it.
 
Well, not along ago I saw a poll that found, for the first time, that most Americans think gay couples should be allowed to wed.
 
That settles it, I guess.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (2) RSS comment feed |
30
…could a charlatan like Glenn Beck (with Sarah Palin as backup) claim that holding his Washington rally on the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s is “divine providence” AND simultaneously claim that an Islamic center shouldn’t be built two blocks from Ground Zero because it offends some people.
 
Am I the only person who thinks it’s fine for Beck & Co. to hold their rally when and where they did AND for the Islamic center to be built on that site?

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (5) RSS comment feed |
30
Over in Afghanistan, according to the newspaper, 25-year-old Khayyam and 19-year-old Siddiqa fell in love;---now Khayyam already had a wife but that wasn’t a hurdle because in Afghanistan men can have four wives; instead the hurdle was his family turned thumbs down on the marriage, plus Siddiqa was already engaged to a relative of Khayyam’s who she didn’t want to marry.
 
Khayyam and Siddiqa eloped.
 
A few months later their families found them hiding in a distant province and promised if they’d come home all would be forgiven. But the day they returned home they were seized by the Taliban which convened a court of Mullahs and convicted them. Next they were taken outside into the bazaar, surrounded by 200 villagers and stoned.
 
Siddiqa in her burqa was killed first.
 
Then Khayyam.
 
Khayyam’s father and brother and Siddiqa’s brother participated in the stoning.
 
Afterwards a local farmer, Nader Khan, told a Kabul reporter, “People were very happy seeing this,” adding the crowd was festive and cheered during the stoning. The couple, he concluded, “did a bad thing.”
 
A spokesman for the Taliban speaking by cell phone also explained to the reporter it all was handled quite properly according to Shariah Law which he claimed is “based on Islamic Law,” at least the way the Taliban sees it.
 

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |
27
It’s a familiar question. I heard it again not long ago.
 
My Republican friend/foe Jack Hawke and I were tossing partisan grenades at each other during a panel on this year’s elections.
 
When it was time for Q&A, the question was: “Can’t the two parties put aside their differences and solve our problems instead of fighting and attacking each other all the time?”
 
No, we can’t. What’s more, we shouldn’t.
 
The question rises from a well-intentioned, civics-book view of politics. But it overlooks the basic fact that politics is about differences and disagreements – often deeply held.
 
An example: On health-care reform, Democrats thought every American should be required to have insurance. Republicans disagreed.
 
There is no middle ground there, no compromise. We either require it, or we don’t.
 
So we see who has the most votes today. Then the other side gets a chance to take its case to the people for their vote.
 
That leads to a lot of fussing and fighting, fuming and fulminating, posturing and positioning.

You may not like that free-for-all. If so, there are places that don’t have it. Like North Korea.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (4) RSS comment feed |
26
Well, Gary, you’re back and I’m glad we’ve got a little controversy on our hands (about the Mosque in Manhattan) and I suspect before we finish debating we may be disagreeing on more than just politics.
 
Let me ask – gingerly – three questions. Are all religions are equal? Should all religions be treated equally? Is there a tie between Islam and terrorism?
 
Are all religions equal? Most people I think would answer this question no. Moslems don’t believe Christ is the Messiah so in their view Christians are making a mistake by worshiping a false God. Most Christians, of course, look at it exactly the other way around. The point is one of these religions has to be right and the other is wrong – so it’s hard to see how they’re equal. Do we disagree?
 
Should all religions be treated equally? In America today we’ve already crossed that bridge and, I suspect, most people would answer this question yes. But that does tend to lead to awkward conflicts and the mosque is an example. To put it delicately, even if a fellow favors freedom of religion, if he has qualms about Islam’s ties to terrorism he may naturally wince at the prospect of a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero.
 
And that brings us face to face with the million dollar question. Is there a tie between Islam and terrorism? Perhaps you know the answer to that. I don’t. But, naturally, ignorance breeds doubt and doubt leads to suspicion.
 
For instance, I look around at the followers of other religions – for example, Hindus or Buddhists – and I wonder if they are as likely to commit acts of terrorism as Muslims. And a brief, unscientific glance at who’s murdering who these days doesn’t reveal a lot of Hindu terrorists. Of course, that doesn’t prove a link exists between Islam and terrorism. Osama bin Laden could be attacking the United States for a number of reasons that have nothing to do with Islam. But I suspect the plumb line in the debate about the mosque boils down to the answer to the question of the ties between Islam and terrorism.
 
I may be completely mischaracterizing your view (and I am sure if I am you’ll correct me) but it seems to me pro-mosque building folks answer that question one of two ways. They say: There’re good people and there’re bad people and Osama bin Laden is a bad person and his religion has nothing to do with it. He’d still be a bad person (and a murderer) if he was a Christian.
 
Or, alternatively, they reason: There are ‘bad Christians’ but that doesn’t prove Christianity is bad. So the fact there are ‘bad Muslims’ doesn’t prove Islam is bad. Therefore, the two religions should be treated equally.
 
That sounds fair and logical and open-minded but, of course, there is the possibility the first statement is true and the second false. After all, I think we’d agree a Christian blowing up 3,000 innocent people would be acting contrary to the teachings of Christ. But I guess it’s possible a Muslim doing the same thing might be acting in accord with the teachings of The Prophet.
 
So here is the question I suspect may take us far beyond politics: What do you think? Like many people who don’t know a great deal about Islam I wonder, Is there something about Islam that leads to the creation of terrorists like Osama bin Laden?
 

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (4) RSS comment feed |
26
The rumor among Republicans is that George Holding will run against Roy Cooper for AG in 2012.
 
That assumes, of course, that Holding doesn’t stay on as U.S. Attorney forever.
 
It also assumes he finally handles his high-profile cases: Mike Easley and John Edwards.
 
Maybe Holding will punt Easley to the state, saying that the Supreme Court ruling on “honest services” makes a federal prosecution impossible.
 
That could be bad news for Edwards. It wouldn’t look good for Holding to keep the bat on his shoulder and not swing twice.
 
Of course, any prosecutor has to worry now about trying Easley or Edwards. If that clown Blagojevich got off, don’t you think Easley and/or Edwards could convince at least one juror to hold out for acquittal?

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (0) RSS comment feed |
Page 1 of 215First   Previous   [1]  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next   Last   
Coming in November!

Coming in November!

Gary's new book about Governor Jim Hunt

**Click to pre-order
 & more infomation**

Listen to Gary talk about the book on
DG Martin's show on WCHL.

Click to listen to:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4

Carter's Book!

Purchase Carter's Book:

Spirits of the Air

Support independent publishing: buy this book on Lulu.

Categories
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  Powered By PointClick  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement