Viewing Category

Entries for the 'Issues ' Category

01
A reader called today with an interesting thought spurred by Richard Burr’s ad.
 
She took issue with his suggestion that all jobs come from the private sector. She pointed out that government contracts with Blackwater, Halliburton, KBR and a raft of defense contractors sure created a bunch of jobs.
 
She has a point. When private companies aren’t hiring, a government job – or a job created by a government contract – can pay the rent.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (4) RSS comment feed |
01
Remember the furor last year when Governor Perdue announced that dozens of long-term, convicted criminals might get out of prison early because of an issue over “good time”?
 
Remember how everybody said what a disaster this would be for her?
 
Remember how critics said she overreacted by threatening to stand in the jailhouse door to prevent their release?
 
Then, last week, did you notice when the state Supreme Court ruled that she was, in fact, right? That the inmates wouldn’t be getting out early?
 
Somehow that didn’t get quite the same attention.
 
The Governor and her people should enjoy some told-you-so’s here.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |
31
My friend Damon Circosta, executive director on the N.C. Center for Voter Education, gets an A for effort but an F for persuasiveness.
 
Circosta, according to Under the Dome, says the flap over Governor Perdue’s campaign not reporting some flights is an argument for “voter-owned” (publicly financed) campaigns. http://projects.newsobserver.com/dome#ixzz0yBS20BU0 
 
The logic goes over my head.
 
Why is a candidate taking public funds any less likely to commit a reporting error than a candidate taking individual and PAC contributions?
 
I hope Damon will enlighten me.
 
As I’ve blogged before, I understand that public-financing supporters are well-intentioned – and right to be concerned about corruption in today’s system. But if President Obama had used public financing, he couldn’t have competed in North Carolina.
 
There is a case to be made for public financing. I just down see how this is it.
 
 
 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (2) RSS comment feed |
31
I’m amused by people who argue that the “mosque” shouldn’t be built near Ground Zero because a poll showed a majority of Americans oppose it.
 
Well, not along ago I saw a poll that found, for the first time, that most Americans think gay couples should be allowed to wed.
 
That settles it, I guess.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (2) RSS comment feed |
30
…could a charlatan like Glenn Beck (with Sarah Palin as backup) claim that holding his Washington rally on the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s is “divine providence” AND simultaneously claim that an Islamic center shouldn’t be built two blocks from Ground Zero because it offends some people.
 
Am I the only person who thinks it’s fine for Beck & Co. to hold their rally when and where they did AND for the Islamic center to be built on that site?

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (5) RSS comment feed |
30
Over in Afghanistan, according to the newspaper, 25-year-old Khayyam and 19-year-old Siddiqa fell in love;---now Khayyam already had a wife but that wasn’t a hurdle because in Afghanistan men can have four wives; instead the hurdle was his family turned thumbs down on the marriage, plus Siddiqa was already engaged to a relative of Khayyam’s who she didn’t want to marry.
 
Khayyam and Siddiqa eloped.
 
A few months later their families found them hiding in a distant province and promised if they’d come home all would be forgiven. But the day they returned home they were seized by the Taliban which convened a court of Mullahs and convicted them. Next they were taken outside into the bazaar, surrounded by 200 villagers and stoned.
 
Siddiqa in her burqa was killed first.
 
Then Khayyam.
 
Khayyam’s father and brother and Siddiqa’s brother participated in the stoning.
 
Afterwards a local farmer, Nader Khan, told a Kabul reporter, “People were very happy seeing this,” adding the crowd was festive and cheered during the stoning. The couple, he concluded, “did a bad thing.”
 
A spokesman for the Taliban speaking by cell phone also explained to the reporter it all was handled quite properly according to Shariah Law which he claimed is “based on Islamic Law,” at least the way the Taliban sees it.
 

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |
26
Well, Gary, you’re back and I’m glad we’ve got a little controversy on our hands (about the Mosque in Manhattan) and I suspect before we finish debating we may be disagreeing on more than just politics.
 
Let me ask – gingerly – three questions. Are all religions are equal? Should all religions be treated equally? Is there a tie between Islam and terrorism?
 
Are all religions equal? Most people I think would answer this question no. Moslems don’t believe Christ is the Messiah so in their view Christians are making a mistake by worshiping a false God. Most Christians, of course, look at it exactly the other way around. The point is one of these religions has to be right and the other is wrong – so it’s hard to see how they’re equal. Do we disagree?
 
Should all religions be treated equally? In America today we’ve already crossed that bridge and, I suspect, most people would answer this question yes. But that does tend to lead to awkward conflicts and the mosque is an example. To put it delicately, even if a fellow favors freedom of religion, if he has qualms about Islam’s ties to terrorism he may naturally wince at the prospect of a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero.
 
And that brings us face to face with the million dollar question. Is there a tie between Islam and terrorism? Perhaps you know the answer to that. I don’t. But, naturally, ignorance breeds doubt and doubt leads to suspicion.
 
For instance, I look around at the followers of other religions – for example, Hindus or Buddhists – and I wonder if they are as likely to commit acts of terrorism as Muslims. And a brief, unscientific glance at who’s murdering who these days doesn’t reveal a lot of Hindu terrorists. Of course, that doesn’t prove a link exists between Islam and terrorism. Osama bin Laden could be attacking the United States for a number of reasons that have nothing to do with Islam. But I suspect the plumb line in the debate about the mosque boils down to the answer to the question of the ties between Islam and terrorism.
 
I may be completely mischaracterizing your view (and I am sure if I am you’ll correct me) but it seems to me pro-mosque building folks answer that question one of two ways. They say: There’re good people and there’re bad people and Osama bin Laden is a bad person and his religion has nothing to do with it. He’d still be a bad person (and a murderer) if he was a Christian.
 
Or, alternatively, they reason: There are ‘bad Christians’ but that doesn’t prove Christianity is bad. So the fact there are ‘bad Muslims’ doesn’t prove Islam is bad. Therefore, the two religions should be treated equally.
 
That sounds fair and logical and open-minded but, of course, there is the possibility the first statement is true and the second false. After all, I think we’d agree a Christian blowing up 3,000 innocent people would be acting contrary to the teachings of Christ. But I guess it’s possible a Muslim doing the same thing might be acting in accord with the teachings of The Prophet.
 
So here is the question I suspect may take us far beyond politics: What do you think? Like many people who don’t know a great deal about Islam I wonder, Is there something about Islam that leads to the creation of terrorists like Osama bin Laden?
 

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (4) RSS comment feed |
23
For twenty years the state ‘crime lab,’ the News and Observer reports, has been withholding evidence and misleading juries at trials and sending innocent people to prison – but no one has been fired, which makes the fate of Eszter Vajda (another state employee who did lose her job last week after the firestorm over her documentary about the cyanide buried around Alcoa’s old aluminum smelter in Stanly County) seem, well, odd.
 
After months of shuffling through environmental reports and reading lawsuits and interviewing widows of Alcoa employees who’d died of cancer, Vajda was not only shocked –  she’d figured out those old files were telling a story she’d never imagined.  But part way through her documentary she ran head on into a hurdle: Her researcher, Martin Sansone, had to go home to England and her employer UNC-TV wouldn’t pay to fly him back to finish the film. 
 
Most sensible young women (and anyone with more common sense than stubbornness) would have given up on making a full length documentary when they couldn’t afford to buy an airplane ticket.  But whatever Eszter Vajda’s vices fear wasn’t one of them.  She had her teeth into a story and to be stopped by an airline ticket was insufferable – so she and Sansone asked a group of Republicans, who’re on the other side of the fight from Alcoa down in Stanly County, to pay Sansone’s expenses. 
 
Taking money from folks opposing Alcoa when you’re making a film about Alcoa wasn’t going to look good, but for years UNC-TV had been taking money from people to make films about them (say, for the Golden Leaf Foundation) so, perhaps, Vajda just looked at what UNC-TV had done in the past and figured, How is this any different?
 
Sansone flew back to Raleigh and Vajda charged ahead and then ran head on into another hurdle: Most journalists thrive on controversy because it sells newspapers.  But the managers of UNC-TV, in addition to being journalists, are level-headed government employees.  They don’t need to air controversial programs (which makes people mad at them) to make money so it’s just plain common sense for them to avoid controversy like the plague. (Two of the features on UNC-TV’s website this morning were “Share Your Favorite Baseball Memory” and “A Tour of the Great Lodges of the Canadian Rockies” with station manager Tom Howe.)
 
When her superiors at UNC-TV told Vajda they didn’t want to air her hour-long documentary she cajoled and appealed but got nowhere – then she lit into them.
 
Raleigh’s no longer a small town but word does still get around and pretty soon ears down at the legislature picked up on the rumblings between Vajda and her bosses and that landed UNC-TV in an odd place:  In the middle of a tug of war between Alcoa’s lobbyists (who were trying to kill a bill Alcoa didn’t like) and a handful of local state legislators trying to pass the bill. The legislators figured, even if they hadn’t seen her film, it couldn’t hurt if Vajda told the story of, for example, Alcoa suing the Health Department to stop it from posting signs along Badin Lake, by its smelter, warning pregnant women not to eat the fish because they were contaminated with PCBs that can cause cancer.
 
But even when the old bull-moose of the Senate, Marc Basnight, weighed in UNC-TV wouldn’t give Vajda what she wanted.  In the end she could only talk the station into airing three short segments – so most of her documentary was headed for the elephant’s graveyard of unfinished documentaries when something even more unexpected happened:  Senator Fletcher Hartsell sent a pair of subpoenas to UNC-TV and Vajda, personally, telling her to bring the full hour long version of her documentary over to his Senate Committee so Senators could look at it.
 
That didn’t trouble anyone much except Vajda’s fellow journalists who saw the idea of subpoenaing a journalist as a kind of heresy and let out a howl of outrage that would have made a tub-thumping Baptist preacher proud.  Hard bitten reporters who’d been publishing public records to embarrass governors for years roared subpoenaing a reporter was unconstitutional and UNC-TV ought to tell Senator Hartsell to stick his subpoena in his ear
 
Trapped between lobbyists, State Senators, and a mob of howling journalists UNC-TV had more controversy on its hands than it had ever dreamed of and when the Attorney General’s office told them there was no legal way to look a judge in the eye and argue a public record created by a journalist (who worked for state government) was exempt from the same laws governors have to abide by they stuck the flag.
 
Vajda trooped over to the legislature and played a rough cut of her documentary to a room packed full of Senators and Alcoa lobbyists and for the first time folks got to see The Alcoa Story and it was a doozy: Right at the start of her film Vajda launched into a list of toxic chemicals that are waste from aluminum smelting – cyanide, arsenic and PCBs – then moved right on into how Alcoa had been dumping them in Stanly County since it opened its smelter in World War I, then moved on into local cancer rates and groundwater contamination and ended up by asking a question it’s kind of amazing no one asked before: Why doesn’t the state do a study to find out if what Alcoa’s been doing down in Stanly County since World War I is a public health threat?
 
Vajda’s documentary sent a shock wave through the legislature and then another odd thing happened:  Out of a clear blue sky UNC-TV started sending letters to people who’d posted her film on the Internet ordering them to take it down because it violated their copyright.  In other words, UNC-TV was saying Vajda’s documentary was a public record but no one could show it to anyone else because it was copywrited
 
If, a year ago, Governor Easley had told the News and Observer, Sure my emails are public records. And sure you can see them. But you can’t publish them. They’re copywrited – the press would have had apoplexy.  But, this time, not one journalist complained.
 
Instead several of Vajda’s fellow journalists tore into her over Sansone’s travels and never mentioned copyrighting public records or PCBs; -- then UNC-TV issued a terse statement saying Vajda was no longer employed by the station.
 
Finally, when the smoke cleared, one local paper – Yes, Weekly – did ask Alcoa the million dollar question – and it’s about all the vindication Vajda is likely to get.
 
What, the paper asked, did Alcoa claim was biased about Vajda’s film?  
 
Well, it wasn’t true, Alcoa spokesman Mike Bellwood said, that Alcoa is a trillion dollar corporation like Ms. Vajda reported. Then he added that Vajda was also wrong when she reported Alcoa’s Yadkin Dams could be ‘recaptured’ by Congress for $16 million. (In fairness to Vajda, in her documentary she actually said Alcoa had told the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ‘recapture’ would cost $24 million.) 
 
As Yes, Weekly pointed out Alcoa didn’t dispute a word Vajda had reported about the cyanide buried around its smelter.
 

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (12) RSS comment feed |
23
Well, Carter, I get your point that the World Trade Center is “hallowed ground.” But why does that mean a mosque, or an Islamic cultural center, shouldn’t be two blocks away?
 
In an area, apparently, that is now home to bars, restaurants and a strip club?
 
Apparently, the reasoning is that anything Islamic anywhere nearby is a violation of this sacred ground. In other words, because a group of Islamic fanatics committed an atrocity, all Muslims and all things Islamic must be held responsible.
 
I don’t buy that.
 
I think what we have here isn’t principle, but pure politics.

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Posted in: General, Issues
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (3) RSS comment feed |
16
Now, Gary, about that mosque in Manhattan you disagree with me about:  It is fine and noble to talk about “freedom” and “tolerance” and “openness” but Charles Krauthamner asked a pretty fair question of his own about this mosque in the newspaper last week:  ‘What makes a place sacred?’
 
He gave three examples of what makes a patch of earth hallowed ground:  A miracle (Lourdes), a noble sacrifice (Gettysburg), or the blood of martyrs and suffering of the innocent (Auschwitz).
 
He continued, ‘When we speak of… hallowed ground, what we mean is it belongs to those who suffered and died there – and such ownership obliges us, the living, to preserve the dignity and memory of the place, never allowing it to be forgotten, trivialized or misappropriated’…that’s why while no one objects to Japanese cultural centers, the idea of putting one up on Pearl Harbor would be offensive… and why Pope John Paul II ordered the Carmelite nuns to leave the convent they had established at Auschwitz… he was teaching them a lesson in respect:  This is not your place.’
 
The Governor of New York offered to find the ‘good Muslims’ you describe in New York another place for their mosque.  They refused.  What more needs to be said?
 

 

Click here to read and comment on what others are saying

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (7) RSS comment feed |
Page 1 of 46First   Previous   [1]  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next   Last   
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  Powered By PointClick  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement