Viewing Category

Raleigh

08
If a newspaper is going to be a ‘Fact Checker’ it ought to take the time to do the research to get its facts straight.
 
A few days ago the News and Observer reported Paul Coble ‘has voted to issue’ millions of dollars in new Wake County bonds (debt) but added, But those bonds were first approved by voters. That statement is incorrect. In 2009 Paul Coble voted to pass $328 million in ‘Limited Obligation Bonds’ voters did not approve. No one other than Paul Coble and the County Commissioners voted to incur the debt.
 
The ‘Fact Checker’ also overlooked another fact: Paul Coble supported passing the $970 million dollar ‘General Obligation Bond’ that was on the ballot in 2006. That debt was passed by voters but Coble urged people to support it before the election – the debt wasn’t forced on him.
 
Fact-Checking is not an easy job, but if you want to say who’s right and who’s wrong take the time to do a little research.
 

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |

07
House Speaker Thom Tillis spent last week catching hand grenades – first his Chief-of-Staff landed on the front page of the newspaper for having an affair with a lobbyist then a second Tillis aide confessed to a peccadillo with another lobbyist; -- both aides promptly resigned (at Tillis’ request) then the press asked Tillis the million dollar question: Did either of those lobbyist get any special treatment – to help pass their bills – from your aides?
 
Now a fellow who’d brushed up against a scandal or two would have taken a deep breath and said, I’m calling for an independent investigation today to find out the answer to that question, and if anything wrong was done I’ll do my best to set it straight – but to Speaker Tillis’ misfortune this is his first scandal so when the reporter asked the question he said he’d already investigated himself and the answer was No, those lobbyists hadn’t received one scrap of special help.
 
When the Democrats read that in the newspaper they couldn’t believe their eyes: Tillis had climbed out on the end of the limb – and the Democrats immediately set about sawing it off behind him: By demanding an independent investigation.
 
What could Tillis do?  If he said No it’d look like a cover-up so he said Yes and if the investigators find one of those lobbyists did get a bit of  special help with a bill then Tillis will have a whole different problem.
 
But one thing is for sure – both Democratic and Republican legislators agree: There will be no independent investigating of peccadilloes involving legislators and lobbyists.
 

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |

02
There’s an outbreak of fornication on Jones Street. In the State House. In Speaker Thom Tillis’ office. Between lobbyists and Tillis’ aides. Yesterday after all the shenanigans landed in the newspapers Speaker Tillis disposed of two aides then, after “reviewing” 130 pages of emails and other records, announced they hadn’t lifted a finger to give the lobbyists any untoward help with their bills.
 
Now it’s a sure bet that next the Democrats are going to call for an investigation: So after John Edwards’ trial passes we’ll be facing a whole new season of ‘political reality shows’ – just in case anyone missed the point that politics has gotten downright seedy.
 

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (3) RSS comment feed |

02
I like the observations below because the TAPster who wrote them not only takes aim at everybody, but also dares to defend lobbyists:
 
“The irony – and hypocrisy -- of this sex scandal is these staffers work for Republican politicians who imposed their personal morals on the state’s citizens by ramming through the proposed constitutional amendment on gay marriage. Perhaps the amendment should’ve said marriage is between a man, a woman and a lobbyist.
 
“Speaker Tillis’ reputation as a savvy business consultant is tarnished by this mess. He’s handled it pretty badly and appears to have no clue what’s going on with his employees – especially when everybody at the legislature knew something was going on.
 
“Lobbyists apparently now can have sex only with other lobbyists.  Considering the talent pool in the lobbyists’ ranks, most lobbyists will give up.
 
“The liberal do-gooders like the pin-heads at Democracy NC scored another victory in their war to turn lobbyists into second-class citizens. It’s bad enough that this scandal is destroying careers and marriages, but the sex is with lobbyists, for goodness sakes, and that apparently makes it even worse. One day, somebody will have the guts to tell know-it-alls like Bob Hall and Elaine Marshall that lobbyists work for citizens and taxpayers who have constitutional rights and pay bunches of taxes to run the state.”

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (0) RSS comment feed |

02
It’s hard to tell who’s crazier: Andrew Young or John Edwards.
 
Back in 1998 in Myrtle Beach Young hears Edwards make a speech and, as Young told it himself in court last week, fell in love. A few years later Rielle Hunter met Edwards in a New York bar and fell in love too. Then Rielle got pregnant. And John told Andrew, She’s a crazy slut, and got Andrew a big stack of cash (from two friendly millionaires) to keep Rielle out of sight while Edwards ran for President.
 
Young got one millionaire to give him $28,000 to buy Rielle a BMW then got the other millionaire to send him another $28,000 (to pay for the same car) to spend on himself.
 
Rielle started feeling ignored by John so she threatened to tell reporters about their affair – two National Enquirer reporters showed up in Chapel Hill, chasing Rielle, and Young talked his wife into letting him tell the press he was Rielle’s child’s father.
 
Rielle and Young went on the lamb over the next year and Young took $1.2 million from the two millionaires to hide Rielle and spent a cool million of it building himself a hilltop home in Chapel Hill.
 
After his Presidential campaign’s kaput John betrays Andrew and Rielle and the knives come out. Andrew finds a sex tape of John and Rielle. Makes a book deal. And a movie deal. And John ends up in federal court facing 30 years in prison with Andrew testifying against him and Rielle set to testify next.
 
And imagine this: Once upon a time, not too long ago, out of old-fashioned probity Democratic Governor Jim Hunt wouldn’t serve wine in the Governor’s Mansion.
 

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (2) RSS comment feed |

02
The N&O story today by Dan Kane and John Frank (“Second Tillis staffer admits to inappropriate relationship with a lobbyist”) had this eye-catching line:
 
“After Thomas’ resignation, Tillis said he returned to his office on Sunday afternoon and questioned five of his 10 remaining staff members, who had been the subject of rumors related to inappropriate behavior.”
 
There probably are some nervous people in the Legislative Building today.

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (0) RSS comment feed |

01
A capital veteran says of the Charles Thomas/lobbyist scandal:
 
“Sex between legislators, staffers and lobbyists isn’t anything new. Been going on for years. What’s new about this is a private investigator hired by an undisclosed client did the N&O’s investigation and the N&O printed the result. This is a spooky precedent.”
 
Laura Leslie at WRAL reported: “Thomas said he believes the private investigator was hired and paid by a political enemy. He declined to name that person on the record but said he is looking into it.”
 
It is the nature of politicians who get caught to blame their political enemies, not themselves. See the claims of “right wing conspiracy” in the N.C. Democratic Party’s recent sex scandal.
 
Maybe Thomas should blame Newt Gingrich. Newt pioneered the modern politics of personal demonization and political destruction in his path to power in 1994. Then he tried to do the same thing to President Clinton.
 
This year Gingrich found himself the victim of personal destruction, at the hands of Mitt Romney’s super PACs. A fitting irony of history for the man who says his historical insights netted him millions of dollars in consulting fees.
 
So how can anyone in public life today be surprised to find themselves in the unforgiving public eye – or, in the case of Thomas, private eye?
 
Had Thomas heard of John Edwards? Did wall-to-wall coverage of Edwards’ trial maybe suggest it’s not wise for a public official to get involved with another woman? (While his wife has cancer, to top it off.)
 
Thomas told WRAL: "No elected official has ever been targeted like this, let alone a non-elected staff member. This is going to open the floodgates."
 
He’s wrong. The floodgates have been wide open for a long time. Anybody and everybody in public office is a target. The only question is whether politicians will figure that out – and act accordingly.

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |

29
Every now and then during the closing days of an election a candidate defines his campaign with one line. Paul Coble did that in the News and Observer this morning. By attacking George Holding for prosecuting Mike Easley and John Edwards.
 
Last week, Paul Coble attacked George Holding for working for Senator Jesse Helms in Washington. This week, Paul Coble’s attacking George Holding for prosecuting Mike Easley and John Edwards.
 
Trailing in the polls, and desperate, this morning Paul Coble’s campaign began falling apart in front of our eyes. Over the next week Coble’s latest attack on George Holding will be the most important issue in his campaign.
 

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (0) RSS comment feed |

27
I’ve seen candidates say some bizarre things when their campaigns fall apart – but this one has to take the cake. Paul Coble’s actually slamming George Holding for prosecuting Mike Easley and John Edwards – and saying those prosecutions were a waste of taxpayers money. We just entered the twilight zone. Paul’s poll numbers have slipped. And we’re watching his campaign come unglued in front of our eyes.
 
 

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (0) RSS comment feed |

23
I think I’m going to start writing columns about reporters who write columns telling folks what’s true and untrue in political ads. After all, the reporters are setting themselves up as referees so why not fact-check the fact-checkers? For instance:
 
A respected reporter here in Raleigh recently wrote a fact-check about the American Foundations Committee’s TV ad about Paul Coble. This reporter is honest. Unbiased. Thoughtful. And careful. But, in my book, this time he got flummoxed. What happened:
 
Paul Coble has endorsed or supported or voted for well over a billion dollars in Wake County debt increases and, in addition, after initially endorsing those bonds Coble has cast the subsequent votes to issue them.
 
Coble’s spinmeister flummoxed the reporter by confusing the two types of votes. Here’s the spin-line: After voters approved the bonds, all Paul did was cast the ‘perfunctory’ votes to issue them.
 
Now that’s not exactly so – because Coble both initially endorsed and subsequently voted to issue over a billion dollars in bonds. Which is what the American Foundations Committee ad said. But the reporter took the bait. Later, to his credit he tried to clear it up. But for over two weeks Paul Coble’s had a headline on his Facebook page roaring: Reporter Says Holding Super PAC Ad Not True.
 
Moral of the story: If you’re fact-checking ads the place to do research is not on the phone with the opposing campaign’s spinmeister.
 
 

 

[Click to read and post comments...]

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |

Page 6 of 50First   Previous   1  2  3  4  5  [6]  7  8  9  10  Next   Last   
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  DNN Hosting  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement