View Article
21
From Singapore to Casablanca outside our embassies Muslims are rioting – so, exactly how much of the Muslim world is mad at us? Ten percent? Half? Ninety percent? Or, more to the point, how many Muslims agree that taking revenge for a YouTube video by murdering a diplomat who never saw or heard the video is wrong? A handful? A lot? Almost all?
 
Last Sunday, President Obama’s Ambassador to the U.N. told us the attack on our embassy was spontaneous. It wasn’t a terrorist attack. But whoever heard of a demonstrator showing up at a riot carrying a grenade launcher? So who attacked our embassy? If it was terrorists – who were they? Where are they? We’ve tried attacking whole nations (two of them) to stop groups of terrorists and that hasn’t worked out too well – so, this time, how do we tell the terrorists from the Muslims who bear us no ill will?
 
And, finally, the biggest question of all: Who is going to answer these questions? President Obama? Secretary Clinton? Congress? Lord, help us, is there someone else? How about the Mossad?
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (3) RSS comment feed |

Comments

dap916
# dap916
Saturday, September 22, 2012 2:44 PM
Carter, you know your questions here on this subject are political hyperbole. I mean, let's face it, my man. The "Obama press" and the leftwing media as a whole has avoided everything and anything about the killing of one of our ambassadors as being anything but something brought on by some video most of those involved in that killing and the riots in the region haven't even seen. This was a planned event and the video gives the president and his campaign an "out" by saying it was not the administrations policies...but the video. I saw Wolf Blitzer on CNN presenting "facts" that could only be favorable to Obama in almost every question he asked to almost every "guest" he had on. Romney could gather up tens of billions of dollars for his campaign and could never, ever offset the CBS, CNN, MSNBC, ABC presentations that are forthcoming. It's a tragedy. I'm thinkin' that Romney will fall to these sources just like McCain fell to them. But, this time around, they'll be the ones that eventually pay the consequences. Wait and see.
dap916
# dap916
Sunday, September 23, 2012 5:32 PM
Well, let's be honest here. The "administration" isn't going to do or say anything much that would be against the muslims. I mean, hey, they are a very lucrative xource of democtatic votes as they come into America, dontchaknow.....just like the illegal Mexican immigrants. It doesn't seem to matter that even though the democratic party and most of its followers are all about women's rights and for abortion-at-will and "gay rights"...muslims in a HUGE majority don't believe in that. It's just all about votes. Democrats and the democratic party is the most disengenuous political element in America. But, alas, with the press behind them, they're getting away with it.

I'd LOVE to see someone argue what I've said. Of course, that's not gonna happen. I said this very same thing on www.dailykos.com and got banned. Think about that.
Carbine
# Carbine
Monday, September 24, 2012 5:15 PM
After the way the current occupant of the White House has treated Israel, I doubt the Mossad is in the mood to do us any favors. You reap what you sow, and this president has sown weakness and the image of an America ambivalent about protecting its interests.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  DNN Hosting  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement