View Article
05
Suddenly the Republican chorus howling for justice has gone silent.
 
The chorus was in full cry for John Edwards, Mike Easley and Bev Perdue.
 
Now comes Charles Thomas. Like Edwards, Thomas held a position of public trust and power. Like Edwards, Thomas cheated on his wife. Like Edwards, Thomas’s wife had cancer.
 
Edwards was investigated and indicted for allegedly breaking campaign-finance laws to hide his affair.
 
Thomas resigned because he had an affair with a lobbyist. Did he do anything improper to help her in the legislature?
 
The House Ethics Committee, interestingly, decided not to investigate.
 
One delegate at the state Republican convention Saturday denounced Thomas, before being abruptly cut off by the chair.
 
Edwards wasn’t convicted, but he was shamed. Everybody agrees he should disappear. Thomas, on the other hand, became a lobbyist.
 
Democrats wonder: Will there be an investigation?
 
And will the media push as hard now as it did then?
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |

Comments

Carbine
# Carbine
Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:01 PM
Investigation of what? What is the crime that is alleged to have been committed? Is there any evidence whatsoever that a crime was committed? I'm pretty sure that in our legal system you have to have some reason to thing that a crime was committed before you can launch an investigation.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  DNN Hosting  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement